MedWatch: Εκατόν δεκαεννέα οδοντιατρεία διαφήμιζαν επεμβάσεις για μπότοξ
37 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
37 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος λέει ότι το MedWatch «σταμάτησε άμεσα» τις διαφημίσεις και η περίληψη αναφέρει μείωση «κατά 91%», παρουσιάζοντας επιτυχία του κυβερνητικού εργαλείου.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον Γεωργιάδη τον ισχυρισμό ότι το Medwatch «Έφερε μείωση 91%».
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει τον ισχυρισμό του υπουργού ότι «Η πλατφόρμα έχει ήδη κάνει τη δουλειά της», παρουσιάζοντας το κυβερνητικό εργαλείο ως επιτυχημένο.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη παραθέτει τον υπουργό να λέει «Η πλατφόρμα κάνει δουλειά» και αναφέρει μείωση 91%.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η «Παραπομπή Πατούλη στην Εθνική Αρχή Διαφάνειας» και η επέκταση του MedWatch περιγράφονται ως διαδικαστικές ενέργειες, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
