Ρήτρα διαφυγής για την ενέργεια αποκλειστικά για την Ελλάδα ενέκρινε η Κομισιόν
37 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
37 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει την έγκριση και αποδίδει στον Πιερρακάκη τον χαρακτηρισμό «Κρίσιμες επενδύσεις 1 δισ. ευρώ».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Παρότι αναφέρει «θετική διάσταση» και επενδύσεις, τονίζει ότι «δεν αλλάζει τίποτα άμεσα για τους πολίτες», δίνοντας μικτό και όχι σαφώς πανηγυρικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η κυβέρνηση παρουσιάζεται να εξασφαλίζει «ζεστό χρήμα» που θα «ξεκοκαλίσουν οι όμιλοι της Ενέργειας».
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, TVXS.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η έγκριση κυβερνητικού αιτήματος και το ότι «Ανοίγει ο δρόμος για επενδύσεις» παρουσιάζονται ως διαδικαστική εξέλιξη και προβλεπόμενη δυνατότητα.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι η Επιτροπή έδωσε το «πράσινο φως» στο αίτημα του ελληνικού υπουργείου, χωρίς πρόσθετη αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την έγκριση κυβερνητικού αιτήματος και «Το μήνυμα Πιερρακάκη», χωρίς να προβάλλει αξιολογική κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι η ενεργειακή ρήτρα «Πέρασε από την Κομισιόν» και ότι δημιουργεί δυνατότητα, χωρίς να την αξιολογεί ως κυβερνητική επιτυχία.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Η ΕΕ μας δίνει ρήτρα διαφυγής» περιγράφει την έγκριση και το προβλεπόμενο πλαίσιο επενδύσεων, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
