Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
37 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι ο Ανδρουλάκης έκανε «προτάσεις για πολιτικές που ήδη υλοποιούνται».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη προβάλλουν την κριτική Μαρινάκη για «Υποσχέσεις Ανδρουλάκη χωρίς ρεαλιστικό σχέδιο και κόστος», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος καταγράφει την απάντηση του κυβερνητικού εκπροσώπου και την κριτική «Βροχή δισεκατομμυρίων, ανέξοδες υποσχέσεις» προς τον Ανδρουλάκη.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει την ανακοίνωση του κυβερνητικού εκπροσώπου με την κριτική «Βροχή δισεκατομμυρίων και ανέξοδες υποσχέσεις», χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει το σχόλιο Μαρινάκη ότι ο Ανδρουλάκης «ξέχασε να μας πει ποιος θα πληρώσει τον λογαριασμό», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει την κριτική Μαρινάκη περί «Ανέξοδες υποσχέσεις χωρίς σχέδιο και ρεαλισμό» προς τον Ανδρουλάκη, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.