Πετρέλαιο θέρμανσης: Ξεκινάει στο 1,55 ευρώ το λίτρο – Στα 40 λεπτά η επιδότηση
61 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
61 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 6 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει τα «Μέτρα κατά της ενεργειακής κρίσης» και την «εξειδίκευση των μέτρων» ως διαδικαστική ενημέρωση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρεται η κυβερνητική στήριξη και η αναμενόμενη τιμή, χωρίς αξιολόγηση πέρα από τις φράσεις «Πολύ κάτω από το €1,75» και «Τριπλή στήριξη».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Οι χαρακτηρισμοί «με το σταγονόμετρο» και «ψίχουλα για τους πολλούς» παρουσιάζουν το επίδομα ως ανεπαρκές.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «40% ακριβότερο από πέρυσι παρά τις επιδοτήσεις» προβάλλει αρνητικά το αποτέλεσμα των κυβερνητικών παρεμβάσεων.
2 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη επικρίνει την κυβερνητική αντιμετώπιση της ακρίβειας ως «μέτρα σχεδόν δύο εβδομάδων και… βλέπουμε» και ο τίτλος τα χαρακτηρίζει «Χάρτινη ασπίδα».
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η «επιδότηση Δημοσίου και διυλιστηρίων» και τα υπόλοιπα μέτρα παρατίθενται πληροφοριακά, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τις μειώσεις και την «αύξηση 30% στο επίδομα θέρμανσης» χωρίς να τις αξιολογεί.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει διαδικαστική εξέλιξη, ότι «Κατατέθηκε στη Βουλή η τροπολογία», και το περιεχόμενο της επιδότησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η «συνδυασμένη κρατική στήριξη» και η «αύξηση του επιδόματος θέρμανσης κατά 30%» περιγράφουν μέτρα χωρίς να τα αξιολογούν.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει την «έκπτωση 20 λεπτών» και το «επίδομα έως 1.500 ευρώ» ως στοιχεία του μέτρου, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «Τριπλή παρέμβαση από την κυβέρνηση» και η περίληψη περιγράφει «το τριπλό πακέτο στήριξης», χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται το ύψος της κρατικής επιδότησης στο πλαίσιο νέων μέτρων, χωρίς αξιολόγηση: «αθροιστική επιδότηση».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος ανακοινώνει «30% αύξηση στα ποσά» του επιδόματος θέρμανσης και παραθέτει τα ποσά, χωρίς αξιολόγηση του μέτρου.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει ότι «η αγορά» θα ανοίξει στα 1,55 ευρώ και ότι υπουργοί εξειδικεύουν τα μέτρα, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρεται σε επικείμενες ανακοινώσεις «για την επιδότηση» με συμμετοχή της «Πολιτείας», χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη καταγράφουν την «Τριπλή παρέμβαση από την κυβέρνηση» και τα ποσά των μειώσεων, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει τις μειώσεις και την αύξηση του επιδόματος ως «Όλα τα νέα μέτρα», χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά την κρατική επιδότηση, αλλά περιγράφει την «διπλή παρέμβαση» και τη μείωση της τιμής χωρίς να την αξιολογεί.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την τιμή «με επιδότηση στην αντλία» χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πολιτικής.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τις «νέες επιδοτήσεις» και την «αύξηση 30% στο επίδομα θέρμανσης» χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τις «3 νέες επιδοτήσεις» και την εξειδίκευση των μέτρων στήριξης της κυβέρνησης χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
