Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
54 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Οι χαρακτηρισμοί «Νόμος “σκούπα” από Πιερρακάκη» και «Άρχισε η “κατεδάφιση”» παρουσιάζουν την κυβερνητική δράση ως αποφασιστική επιτυχία.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον Πιερρακάκη τη δήλωση «Η δημοφιλία δεν προσφέρει ασυλία» και η περίληψη παραθέτει μέτρα και στοιχεία χωρίς αξιολογικό συμπέρασμα.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι η Ελλάδα «Files Complaints» και η περίληψη αποδίδει την ανακοίνωση στον υπουργό, ως διαδικαστική κυβερνητική ενέργεια.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος παραθέτει τις μηνύσεις και τη δήλωση του υπουργού «Η δημοφιλία δεν προσφέρει ασυλία», χωρίς να τις χαρακτηρίζει επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον Πιερρακάκη τις μηνύσεις και αναφέρει ότι προβλέπονται «πρόστιμα έως 50.000 ευρώ», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής ενέργειας.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος συνδέει την υπόθεση με τον Πιερρακάκη και δηλώνει ότι «Η δημοφιλία δεν προσφέρει ασυλία», χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον υπουργό τις μηνύσεις και τη δήλωση «Το διαδίκτυο δεν είναι ζούγκλα», παρουσιάζοντας κυβερνητική ενέργεια χωρίς αξιολογικό συμπέρασμα.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.