Καύσιμα: Επιδότηση 20 λεπτά στο ντίζελ και 10 λεπτά στη βενζίνη από κράτος και διυλιστήρια
32 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
32 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο «μεγαλύτερος “πονοκέφαλος” για την κυβέρνηση» αναφέρεται στη διαχείριση των καυσίμων, αλλά δεν αποδίδει συγκεκριμένη αποτυχία ή υπαιτιότητα.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Μέτρα-ασπιρίνες» και η έμφαση στο «μόνο 5 λεπτά» παρουσιάζουν την κυβερνητική παρέμβαση ως ανεπαρκή.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Το “ράλι” τιμών “καταπίνει” την επιδότηση» παρουσιάζει την παρέμβαση ως ανεπαρκή απέναντι στις αυξήσεις.
1 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη περιγράφουν την αναμενόμενη τιμή «μετά τη νέα επιδότηση», χωρίς να αξιολογούν την κυβερνητική ενέργεια.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρονται η «Αυξημένη επιδότηση» και η επέκταση της έκπτωσης, χωρίς να παρουσιάζονται ως κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ανακοινώνονται μέτρα, μεταξύ των οποίων η «Αύξηση της επιδότησης» και η ρύθμιση οφειλών, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται η κυβερνητική παρέμβαση και η «δύσκολη εξίσωση» των διαθέσιμων δημοσιονομικών περιθωρίων, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται η «ενισχυμένη επιδότηση» και τα ποσά που συνεισφέρουν κυβέρνηση και διυλιστήρια, ως ανακοίνωση μέτρου χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
