Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
23 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Το «ΥΠΕΘΟ γκρεμίζει το αφήγημα» παρουσιάζει την κυβερνητική αμφισβήτηση ως επιτυχημένη αποκάλυψη, ενώ η φράση «Λέει ψέματα όπως αναπνέει» επικρίνει τον Τσίπρα.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αποδίδει σε πηγές του οικονομικού επιτελείου της κυβέρνησης την κοστολόγηση των μέτρων και την εκτίμηση «πάνω από 40 δισ.», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει το «πραγματικό κόστος» σύμφωνα με το ΥΠΕΘΟ, χωρίς να επαινεί ή να επικρίνει την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι το υπουργείο Οικονομικών κοστολόγησε τις εξαγγελίες στα «πάνω από 40 δις», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation: Αποδίδει σε πηγές του υπουργείου την εκτίμηση ότι το πρόγραμμα «κοστίζει πάνω από 40 δισ. ευρώ», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αποδίδει σε πηγές του οικονομικού επιτελείου της κυβέρνησης την εκτίμηση «Μέτρα πάνω από 40 δισ.», χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβερνητική ενέργεια.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την κοστολόγηση του προγράμματος από το ΥΠΕΘΟ και την αντίθεση ανάμεσα στα «40 δισ.» και τα «7,5 δισ.», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.