Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
33 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι «Οι επιδοτήσεις περιορίζουν κατά 50% την άνοδο», προβάλλοντας θετικό αποτέλεσμα κρατικού μέτρου.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «Πώς διαμορφώνεται η τιμή μετά τα κυβερνητικά μέτρα» αναφέρεται στην επίδραση των μέτρων χωρίς να την αξιολογεί.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει την επιδότηση ως θέμα σχετικό με τις τιμές, χωρίς να την αξιολογεί: «Τι ισχύει με την επιδότηση».
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Rosa, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation: Η επιδότηση αναφέρεται ως πλαίσιο του χάρτη τιμών, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πολιτικής: «με την επιδότηση».
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι «οι επιδοτήσεις περιορίζουν κατά 50% την αύξηση της τιμής» και ότι οι καταναλωτές τηρούν στάση αναμονής, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η επιδότηση αναφέρεται ως πλαίσιο των τιμών, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πολιτικής: «με την επιδότηση».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τη μέση τιμή «με τις επιδοτήσεις» και την πλατφόρμα του επιδόματος, χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει τη μέση τιμή «μετά τις επιδοτήσεις» και την έναρξη της πλατφόρμας, χωρίς ρητή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επιτυχίας ή αποτυχίας.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει την τιμή «με τις επιδοτήσεις» και την προγραμματισμένη πλατφόρμα για το επίδομα, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.