Σε ισχύ ο νέος εξωδικαστικός μηχανισμός για προστασία της κύριας κατοικίας
52 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
52 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη περιγράφουν τι μπορούν να πετύχουν οι οφειλέτες μέσω του μηχανισμού, δηλαδή «“Κούρεμα” οφειλής έως 50%» με προστασία της κατοικίας.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι τίθεται σε ισχύ το «νέο, ενισχυμένο πλαίσιο» και «πώς λειτουργεί», ως περιγραφή του μέτρου.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Documento, Estia, LamiaReport, Parallaxi, Rosa, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει «τι αλλάζει» και η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι «περισσότεροι οφειλέτες» μπορούν να ενταχθούν στη ρύθμιση, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται η έναρξη και το περιεχόμενο του μέτρου ως «νέος μηχανισμός για την προστασία της κύριας κατοικίας», χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επιτυχίας ή αποτυχίας.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «“Ασπίδα” για το σπίτι με αντάλλαγμα άλλα ακίνητα» και η αναφορά στον υπολογισμό δόσης και «κουρέματος» περιγράφουν τους όρους της ρύθμισης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη αναφέρουν διαδικαστικές αλλαγές, όπως το «όριο συνολικών οφειλών» και την «υποβολή νέων αιτήσεων».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη περιγράφουν τους όρους της ρύθμισης, όπως «εκποίηση εξοχικών και άλλων περιουσιακών στοιχείων» και «240 δόσεις», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η «νέα “ασπίδα”» και η εξήγηση για το «πώς υπολογίζονται πλέον “κούρεμα” και μηνιαία δόση» περιγράφουν το μέτρο χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι ο νέος μηχανισμός τίθεται «σε πλήρη λειτουργία» για την προστασία της κύριας κατοικίας, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει μόνο ότι ο μηχανισμός βρίσκεται «σε πλήρη λειτουργία» για την προστασία της κύριας κατοικίας.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
