Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
Our measurement comes from the outlet's own texts. Here you see it beside the readers' view, and you can give yours too. Readers never change the measurement.
Towards the governmentReaders: 0 of 30
ΟικονομίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
ΚοινωνίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
0neutral
Its headlines take a side in 79 of 465 stories (17%). Only these count towards the rating.
positive in 47neutral in 386critical in 32
Κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη (2023) · from headlines on 465 shared stories from September to October 2026, judged by an artificial intelligence model · changes every night
Only the stories in which its headlines took a side count: 47 positive and 32 critical, 1.4 positive for every critical one. Rating ±1 when one side has at least twice as many stories as the other, ±2 four times, ±3 nine times; here 0.
A positive headline means it presents a government success, even when it reports a statement; it does not mean the outlet agrees.
The model's explanation: Οι χαρακτηρισμοί «Συντριπτικό μπλόκο» και «πετούν στο καλάθι των αχρήστων» παρουσιάζουν την κοινή ενέργεια της Ελλάδας ως αποφασιστική επιτυχία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη παραθέτει τον υπουργό να λέει «Η πλατφόρμα κάνει δουλειά» και αναφέρει μείωση 91%.
From the outlet's editorials and regular columnists, not from its reporting. Artificial intelligence models read the texts, with the list of issues we publish.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Not on this map: Οικονομία, few texts.
Parties: their place from their official texts (programmes, decisions, speeches), with the same issues and the same arithmetic as the outlets.
Οικονομίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 0 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
Κοινωνίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 3 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
Columnists: Νίκος Ταμουρίδης (3 texts) +3.0
From the editorials (counted together, with double weight) and the outlet's regular columnists · Nov 2025 to Oct 2026. The white marks on the line are the editorials and the outlet's columnists.
In how many opinion texts the outlet takes a side, for each issue on our list. The ones that count most first.
No issue with these filters.
Who owns an outlet does not shape the stance we measure for it, or the other way round.
Ownership is checked on its own, against its own sources. An outlet's stance is measured without looking at who owns it, and the same in reverse. Neither one ever feeds the other.
Unverified, research neededView full ownership chain →
Every position rests on texts and headlines shown on this page. If you are from the outlet and a position misrepresents you, write to us and say why.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι ο υπουργός «ανακοίνωσε αύξηση 30%» χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβερνητική απόφαση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει την προειδοποίηση του Μητσοτάκη «Κινδυνεύουμε με αποβιομηχάνιση», η οποία αφορά την Ευρώπη και όχι αξιολόγηση της ελληνικής κυβέρνησης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος χαρακτηρίζει την έγκριση ως «Δεύτερη ήττα για το ελληνικό ΥΠΕΞ» και η περίληψη προβλέπει στρατιωτική αξιοποίησή της κατά της Ελλάδας.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η Καρυστιανού κατηγορεί τον ανακριτή ότι «εκτελεί εντολές Μητσοτάκη» και ότι «έχει γίνει το μπάζωμα», προβάλλοντας κυβερνητική υπαιτιότητα.
An artificial intelligence model judges every headline and writes its explanation. Before publication, a second model from another company judged 300 headlines again without seeing the first answer or the outlet. This is not a check by people.