Μητσοτάκης από τον ΟΗΕ: «Πυλώνας σταθερότητας και ειρήνης η Ελλάδα – Δεν είμαστε κράτος-ταραξίας»
48 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
48 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο πρωθυπουργός προβάλλει ότι «η οικονομία αναπτύσσεται με πολύ υψηλότερο ρυθμό» και ότι οι μεταρρυθμίσεις «έφεραν σημαντικά αποτελέσματα».
1 of its 6 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, Nea Kriti, Proto Thema, Ta Nea.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει την πρόταση ότι οι εταιρείες AI «πρέπει να λαμβάνουν άδειες» βάσει απαιτήσεων, χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη μεταφέρουν τη θέση του πρωθυπουργού ότι ο διάλογος δεν μπορεί να συνυπάρχει με «μονομερείς ενέργειες και απειλές πολέμου», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
6 of its 6 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη καταγράφουν μηνύματα προς Τουρκία και ΗΠΑ και «προειδοποίηση για την AI», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της ελληνικής κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προαναγγέλλει τι «θα πει» ο πρωθυπουργός και η περίληψη αναφέρει πότε θα γίνει η ομιλία, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη μεταφέρουν τη θέση του πρωθυπουργού για διάλογο «μόνο στη βάση του διεθνούς δικαίου», χωρίς να αξιολογούν κυβερνητική επίδοση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι ο πρωθυπουργός θεωρεί «απαραίτητο» τον διάλογο και χαρακτηρίζει το Κυπριακό «ανοιχτή πληγή», χωρίς να αποδίδει κυβερνητική ευθύνη ή επίδοση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
