Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
15 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος χαρακτηρίζει ρητά το σχέδιο ως «Στήριξη του δημόσιου Πανεπιστημίου» και προβάλλει την αύξηση του επιδόματος.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «Στήριξη του δημόσιου Πανεπιστημίου» και η αναφορά ότι το επίδομα «έχει αυξηθεί έως και 150%» προβάλλουν κυβερνητικό όφελος.
The model's explanation: Η υπουργική δήλωση ότι τα μέτρα σημαίνουν «στήριξη του δημόσιου Πανεπιστημίου» προβάλλει θετικά την κυβερνητική πολιτική.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει το περιεχόμενο του σχεδίου φοιτητικής μέριμνας, με τις φράσεις «8.600 νέες κλίνες» και «80 εκατ. ευρώ για δωρεάν σίτιση».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.