Δημοσκόπηση GPO για Παραπολιτικά: Τι δείχνει για το νέο κόμμα Σαμαρά - Πώς κρίνουν οι πολίτες τους προέδρους της ΝΔ (Πίνακες)
39 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
39 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη προβάλλει «Προβάδισμα Μητσοτάκη στην αξιολόγηση των μέτρων» και ο τίτλος ότι η ΝΔ είναι «Σταθερά πρώτη».
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αναφέρει «Καλύτερες οι επιδόσεις Μητσοτάκη έναντι των άλλων πολιτικών αρχηγών» και ο τίτλος ότι η ΝΔ είναι «Σταθερά μπροστά».
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
Have not covered it: Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, Parallaxi, Rosa, To Vima.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει την «εκτίμηση ψήφου» και ότι «Καταλληλότερος για πρωθυπουργός ο Κυριάκος Μητσοτάκης», χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει δημοσκοπικές επιδόσεις και απαντήσεις για τα προγράμματα της ΔΕΘ, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης, με αναφορές όπως «Πρωτιά στη Νέα Δημοκρατία» και «πείσθηκε περισσότερο».
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
