Μητσοτάκης: «Το πετρέλαιο θέρμανσης θα ανοίξει κάτω από τα 1,75 ευρώ – Οριζόντια αύξηση στο επίδομα»
51 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
51 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος παραθέτει την εξαγγελία «Εθνική παρέμβαση» και την προβλεπόμενη τιμή, χωρίς να αξιολογεί το μέτρο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
Have not covered it: Estia, Kathimerini.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Οι «εξαγγελίες για στήριξη» και η χαμηλότερη τιμή δηλώνονται ως μελλοντικό σχέδιο, χωρίς ισχυρισμό επιτυχίας ή αποτυχίας.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η «εθνική παρέμβαση» για το πετρέλαιο και οι αναμενόμενες εξαγγελίες περιγράφονται ως σχέδιο, χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει κυβερνητικά μηνύματα και «ανάσχεση της ακρίβειας» ως θεματολογία, χωρίς να ισχυρίζεται ότι η κυβέρνηση πέτυχε ή απέτυχε.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζεται ως εξαγγελία μέτρου στήριξης η «οριζόντια αύξηση στο επίδομα θέρμανσης», χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφεται η εξαγγελία του πρωθυπουργού για «αύξηση του επιδόματος θέρμανσης», χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Η «εθνική παρέμβαση», η αύξηση επιδόματος και η επιστροφή πλαφόν παρουσιάζονται ως προαναγγελίες μέτρων, όχι ως αποτίμηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζονται το «πρώτο πακέτο μέτρων» και η εξέταση πλαφόν ως κυβερνητικές αποφάσεις ή σχέδια, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
