Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
18 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Πακέτο-ανάσα» και η αναφορά σε «μεγαλύτερο διαθέσιμο εισόδημα» προβάλλουν θετικά οφέλη των κυβερνητικών μέτρων.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τους «τέσσερις πυλώνες» των μέτρων του πρωθυπουργού και την παρουσίασή τους, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά την κυβερνητική ανακοίνωση και εξειδίκευση μέτρων, περιγράφοντας «ποιοι κερδίζουν και πόσο» χωρίς να τα αξιολογεί ρητά.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει την εξειδίκευση του κυβερνητικού οικονομικού σχεδίου με «ελαφρύνσεις, αυξήσεις μισθών και στεγαστικά», χωρίς ρητό έπαινο ή κριτική.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την κυβερνητική εξειδίκευση και το «ποιοι κερδίζουν» χωρίς ρητά αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει διαδικαστικά «τα νέα ποσά, οι δικαιούχοι και οι ημερομηνίες» των μέτρων χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την παρουσίαση των κυβερνητικών παρεμβάσεων και το «τι αλλάζει» χωρίς ρητή αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.