FeedProtagoras has a configured feed for this outlet.
SofokleousIn
SofokleousIn is a digital financial-news outlet serving the whole of Greece (national reach). It is published by ΦΡΗ ΝΤΙ Α.Ε. (FREED Α.Ε.).
SofokleousIn is a digital financial-news outlet serving the whole of Greece (national reach). It is published by ΦΡΗ ΝΤΙ Α.Ε. (FREED Α.Ε.).
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
Our measurement comes from the outlet's own texts. Here you see it beside the readers' view, and you can give yours too. Readers never change the measurement.
Towards the governmentReaders: 0 of 30
ΟικονομίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
ΚοινωνίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
0neutral
Its headlines take a side in 122 of 679 stories (18%). Only these count towards the rating.
positive in 56neutral in 557critical in 66
Κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη (2023) · from headlines on 679 shared stories from September to October 2026, judged by an artificial intelligence model · changes every night
Only the stories in which its headlines took a side count: 56 positive and 66 critical, 1.1 critical for every positive one. Rating ±1 when one side has at least twice as many stories as the other, ±2 four times, ±3 nine times; here 0.
7 stories have not been judged yet.
A positive headline means it presents a government success, even when it reports a statement; it does not mean the outlet agrees.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος παρουσιάζει θετικά ότι η Ελλάδα «εδραιώνεται ως πυλώνας σταθερότητας» και «ενισχύει τον ρόλο της ως ενεργειακός κόμβος».
The model's explanation: Οι αναβαθμίσεις παρουσιάζονται ως επιβεβαίωση της εικόνας της Ελλάδας ως «νησίδας πολιτικής και οικονομικής σταθερότητας».
From the outlet's editorials and regular columnists, not from its reporting. Artificial intelligence models read the texts, with the list of issues we publish.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Not on this map: Οικονομία, few texts.
Parties: their place from their official texts (programmes, decisions, speeches), with the same issues and the same arithmetic as the outlets.
Οικονομίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 2 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
Κοινωνίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 1 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
From the editorials (counted together, with double weight) and the outlet's regular columnists · Dec 2025 to Oct 2026.
In how many opinion texts the outlet takes a side, for each issue on our list. The ones that count most first.
1 for · 0 against · 0 mixed
Counts toward: Κρατική παρέμβαση
For · Editorial
«Προσανατολισμένη δογματικά στην “ελεύθερη αγορά”, δεν θέλει να επιβάλει πλαφόν στις τιμές, ούτε να φορολογήσει τα υπερκέρδη των διυλιστηρίων και άλλων ενεργειακών εταιρειών»
Τιμές ενέργειας: Εργαλεία υπάρχουν, πολιτική βούληση δεν υπάρχει · 26 Sept 2026 · Open at the source · Dispute
1 for · 0 against · 0 mixed
Counts toward: Κρατική παρέμβαση
For · Editorial
«αποδεικνύοντας ότι είναι εφικτό σε μια σύγχρονη ευρωπαϊκή οικονομία να τεθούν όρια στην αγορά προς όφελος του κοινωνικού συνόλου»
Το ισπανικό σχέδιο για τη στέγαση: Από την κρίση στην προσιτή κατοικία · 31 Jan 2026 · Open at the source · Dispute
Who owns an outlet does not shape the stance we measure for it, or the other way round.
Ownership is checked on its own, against its own sources. An outlet's stance is measured without looking at who owns it, and the same in reverse. Neither one ever feeds the other.
Χαράλαμπος Νιάκας, Ιωάννης Σοφός, Επαμεινώνδας ΒλάχοςView full ownership chain →
Every position rests on texts and headlines shown on this page. If you are from the outlet and a position misrepresents you, write to us and say why.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την τιμή «με επιδότηση στην αντλία» χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πολιτικής.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι «Αυξάνεται 30% το επίδομα θέρμανσης» και ότι προβλέπεται επιδότηση, χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Μια τρύπα στο νερό» αποδίδει αποτυχία στο νομοσχέδιο της κυβέρνησης, έστω ως κριτική του Βελόπουλου.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Το “φούσκωσαν” φόροι και ετεροχρονισμένες πληρωμές» υποβαθμίζει το πλεόνασμα ως αποτέλεσμα τεχνητής διόγκωσης.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
An artificial intelligence model judges every headline and writes its explanation. Before publication, a second model from another company judged 300 headlines again without seeing the first answer or the outlet. This is not a check by people.